While comparing my rough draft with the final paper I have
turned it, I see plenty of changes. First of all, my rough draft was short and
messy, while the final paper was neat and organized in the means of sentence
and paragraph structure. Also, I have replaced some of the words that were
repeating or were not on the college writing level, which significantly
improved the look and style of my final paper. I did plenty of revisions to the
content and organization. I managed to shift and move some paragraphs to more
acceptable place. I also decided to get rid of some that did not fit in overall
composition. I improved the focus of the story by narrowing the topic, and
leaving only the most credential and important thoughts selection. After
revising my paper it was clear to me that I have a major issue with sentence
structure and run on sentences. The peer review did a great job guiding me in
the process of revising my paper. Jeremy M, my peer reviewer gave me clues to
improve my essay and told me some of his ideas of how to make it flow nicer. He
also instructed me not to focus on the story line, but on the literacy
narrative portion of the essay. As a matter of fact, the peer review was extremely
helpful in my writing process. I think the strongest aspect of my essay is the
vocabulary and the humorous mood shifts. The weakest part of my essay is the
sentence structure and grammar, which I have always have trouble with.
Brak komentarzy:
Prześlij komentarz